It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
HellAtlantic said:I'm not liking what I'm hearing about Ball, really sounds like Hillman is not going to just go away. I'm taking Bell at 1.1, 1.2 owner will probably take Austin or Gio (PPR league), leaving me Lacey, Ball and one of Austin/Gio to choose from. I'm coming around to Lacey. Good RBs come from good teams, and I think he'll get great usage and goal line opportunities. I'm starting to warm up to the idea of Lacey at 1.3. It's a long way till week 1 but I think John Fox is gonna screw Ball around all yr and the Packers are gonna hand the keys to Lacey. Thoughts?
HellAtlantic said:Plus John fox
Plus his measureables don't stack up too well to other RB prospects (Christine Michael being the best). He has very average measurables.
so did emit smith ...and that turn out ok..
;) :D
but I do agree CM probably is the most talented back in the draft but does make some bad decision hopefully he wont do that in the pros..
bddavidson said:
but I do agree CM probably is the most talented back in the draft but does make some bad decision hopefully he wont do that in the pros..
HellAtlantic said:by Dave Richard | Senior Fantasy Writer
(07/01/13) Broncos running back Ronnie Hillman claims he wasn't 100 percent healthy at any point during the regular season as a rookie after hurting his hamstring in training camp last summer.
"I never really recovered but I got healthier than what it was," he told reporters via the official team website. "I'm healthy now, so all I can do is look forward to it now."
Hillman, who has put on some weight this offseason to be more durable, is in a battle for playing time this summer with rookie Montee Ball and veteran Knowshon Moreno. Many expect Hillman to be a significant contributor for the Broncos in 2013.
bddavidson said:why is it ok for lacy to be a workhorse two down/goaline/ back and ball not?
HellAtlantic said:bddavidson said:why is it ok for lacy to be a workhorse two down/goaline/ back and ball not?
Because his HC won't f**k with his carries and use a RBBC for no reason.
I think Lacey can be the next Michael Turner (when he was good). And since I have the 2.2 pick I think I can get Franklin (although I much rather take Michael or Latavious at that pick).
HellAtlantic said:bddavidson said:why is it ok for lacy to be a workhorse two down/goaline/ back and ball not?
Because his HC won't f**k with his carries and use a RBBC for no reason.
I think Lacey can be the next Michael Turner (when he was good). And since I have the 2.2 pick I think I can get Franklin (although I much rather take Michael or Latavious at that pick).