Without regard for need, who would you rather have long term, Quick or Pead?
georgeFebruary 18
Posts: 712
I'd take Pead, as I'm not convinced of how well Bradford will hook up with Quick, and how determined Quick is to succeed.
Whos_Ur_DoggieFebruary 18
Posts: 11,693
As much as I like Quick and think he will eventually crack that STL starting lineup, I would rather have Pead between the two. I really think Pead becomes the primary back in the future RBBC in STL.
DC Nation Moderator
haimez40February 18
Posts: 2,375
I'm going against the grain and saying Quick. Boom or Bust, and I think Quick has a better chance of being a worth fantasy starter week to week. I think the Rams will draft another solid RB or get one via free agency if SJax leaves. No doubt though Pead might be the safer play value wise if your looking to flip the player via trade at some point, but I think if the light switches on for Quick he could be very solid. I think coming from a small school to the NFL the speed kind of shocked him, after a year to adjust and prepare he will be a solid play.......if his head is on straight and he has been working out. It will be more than obvious by training camp if you have time to make the choice.
I don't trust Adam Schefter and neither should you!!!
JRMRRTFebruary 18
Posts: 10,774
Im going Quick as well. Im not a Pead fan. I think the other 2nd year RB there is better.
Give me Pead, he'll see the field a lot more than Quick who may not even be ready to be the WR3 on his own team.
"I'm like birth control. You have to believe in me. Like birth control, 99.9 percent of the time I'm going to come through for you." - David Wilson
DC Nation Forum Moderator
rhinos00February 18
Posts: 506
Long term I would take Quick. He has the physical attributes to be a solid WR.