It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
jknighton said:In startup dynasty drafts that include rookies, what round would you feel safe taking one without knowing a landing spot?
I gotta know! Lol mainly the WRs not really the RBs
footballjunkie said:You da man Smitty!
Quickly, Crabtree does have a 1,000 yard season; went for 85/1105/9 last year.
cohendpt said:so based on the downside board player #2, which of his backups would you rather own? I currently have both in a $100 salary league at 1 dollar a piece, but would like to cut ties with one of them for another roster spot. who would you rather keep?
SweetLew said:Great read
rabidbucfan said:nice job Smitty
footballjunkie said:You da man Smitty!
Quickly, Crabtree does have a 1,000 yard season; went for 85/1105/9 last year.
Troy_Polamalyourass said:Great job Smitty....u have B Myers twice in the article, FYI
Smitty said:jknighton said:In startup dynasty drafts that include rookies, what round would you feel safe taking one without knowing a landing spot?
I gotta know! Lol mainly the WRs not really the RBs
That's tough. I would say you'd be "reckless" to grab a rookie anywhere near the 5th or 6th rounds? I have Ball near the start of the 5th on my Top 200 list for dynasty... but, that doesn't mean you take him there. That's bold, and likely to change, and we don't even know where the landing spots are, and if coaches believe, if the situations warrant playing time.
I know you say WRS, but Ball is my first rookie listed, so if a WR is near Ball's value in your eyes (meaning that's your No. 1 rookie), man, I think you could want to take a rookie in the 5th, or even 4th, once we have landing spots, but even knowing who the most talented players are with our own eyes, landing what players actually land in the good spots, that's all roll of the dice. Lacy could be the number one back by default due to landing spot, something I won't support long-term, but the same thing could go down with Patterson, or DeAndre Hopkins. Either could be 5th to 6th round material, and that would be INSANELY BOLD THOUGH... but either could be if in the right spot. What's the right spot? That's even hard to say at this point.
So, all in all, know that later you could regret "waiting" on the rookies, but that will all be hindsight stuff... right now, you just can't take a rookie higher than round 5 or 6, no matter what IMO. And even then, that's early, and what if you grab the wrong one? Drafting a start up prior is madness, but I love it :) There is strategy in that, so I actually find that fun. Ball, Knile Davis, Bell.. one of those guys could be elite.. which one? Your landing spot guesses are as good as mine. And the receivers, wow, that's even tougher to predict.
Smitty said:Smitty said:jknighton said:In startup dynasty drafts that include rookies, what round would you feel safe taking one without knowing a landing spot?
I gotta know! Lol mainly the WRs not really the RBs
That's tough. I would say you'd be "reckless" to grab a rookie anywhere near the 5th or 6th rounds? I have Ball near the start of the 5th on my Top 200 list for dynasty... but, that doesn't mean you take him there. That's bold, and likely to change, and we don't even know where the landing spots are, and if coaches believe, if the situations warrant playing time.
I know you say WRS, but Ball is my first rookie listed, so if a WR is near Ball's value in your eyes (meaning that's your No. 1 rookie), man, I think you could want to take a rookie in the 5th, or even 4th, once we have landing spots, but even knowing who the most talented players are with our own eyes, landing what players actually land in the good spots, that's all roll of the dice. Lacy could be the number one back by default due to landing spot, something I won't support long-term, but the same thing could go down with Patterson, or DeAndre Hopkins. Either could be 5th to 6th round material, and that would be INSANELY BOLD THOUGH... but either could be if in the right spot. What's the right spot? That's even hard to say at this point.
So, all in all, know that later you could regret "waiting" on the rookies, but that will all be hindsight stuff... right now, you just can't take a rookie higher than round 5 or 6, no matter what IMO. And even then, that's early, and what if you grab the wrong one? Drafting a start up prior is madness, but I love it :) There is strategy in that, so I actually find that fun. Ball, Knile Davis, Bell.. one of those guys could be elite.. which one? Your landing spot guesses are as good as mine. And the receivers, wow, that's even tougher to predict.
Anyone else have any advice here? This was a tough question, and want to give Jknighton a great answer. Other advice? I quoted what he said and what I said above... add what you can!
jknighton said:Smitty said:Smitty said:jknighton said:In startup dynasty drafts that include rookies, what round would you feel safe taking one without knowing a landing spot?
I gotta know! Lol mainly the WRs not really the RBs
That's tough. I would say you'd be "reckless" to grab a rookie anywhere near the 5th or 6th rounds? I have Ball near the start of the 5th on my Top 200 list for dynasty... but, that doesn't mean you take him there. That's bold, and likely to change, and we don't even know where the landing spots are, and if coaches believe, if the situations warrant playing time.
I know you say WRS, but Ball is my first rookie listed, so if a WR is near Ball's value in your eyes (meaning that's your No. 1 rookie), man, I think you could want to take a rookie in the 5th, or even 4th, once we have landing spots, but even knowing who the most talented players are with our own eyes, landing what players actually land in the good spots, that's all roll of the dice. Lacy could be the number one back by default due to landing spot, something I won't support long-term, but the same thing could go down with Patterson, or DeAndre Hopkins. Either could be 5th to 6th round material, and that would be INSANELY BOLD THOUGH... but either could be if in the right spot. What's the right spot? That's even hard to say at this point.
So, all in all, know that later you could regret "waiting" on the rookies, but that will all be hindsight stuff... right now, you just can't take a rookie higher than round 5 or 6, no matter what IMO. And even then, that's early, and what if you grab the wrong one? Drafting a start up prior is madness, but I love it :) There is strategy in that, so I actually find that fun. Ball, Knile Davis, Bell.. one of those guys could be elite.. which one? Your landing spot guesses are as good as mine. And the receivers, wow, that's even tougher to predict.
Anyone else have any advice here? This was a tough question, and want to give Jknighton a great answer. Other advice? I quoted what he said and what I said above... add what you can!
What about Hopkins at the end of the 6th?
bddavidson said:i play in alot of 16 team leagues rookies come off around rd 6.. in a 12 man league i would say around late 7th or 8th..
PhillyPanthers said:smitty....what are your thoughts on finley resigning with packers? I remember you were very high on him before. Thanks!
jknighton said:I like taking chances so I grabbed Hopkins at 6.09 before I seen this. I can still get some good WR depth though. Rookie RBs intrigue me but I'm not sure exactly where I would take that chance on one. I'm guessing late 8th - 10th?
Smitty said:jknighton said:I like taking chances so I grabbed Hopkins at 6.09 before I seen this. I can still get some good WR depth though. Rookie RBs intrigue me but I'm not sure exactly where I would take that chance on one. I'm guessing late 8th - 10th?
Hey man, I love the kid, and if a team believes in him like I do, you will be sitting in a nice position. Let's hope he can get a WR1 slot on some team with a good passer!