It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Troy_Polamalyourass said:Just a thought, but I would alter the starting lineup to QB, RB, WR, TE and one flex....that would make each owner have to start the right players....also, I would eliminate free agency and only allow trades...
DAXstatic said:2qbs, 3rbs, 4wrs, 2tes, 2flex, 2k, 2def.
That's the only way a 8 team league could hold any interest for me.
.
Whos_Ur_Doggie said:I would at least expand to 10 teams. Anything smaller is not very appealing IMO.
Troy_Polamalyourass said:
Whos_Ur_Doggie said:I would at least expand to 10 teams. Anything smaller is not very appealing IMO.
My Dynasty League was 8 teams for 2 years, 10 teams for 3 years, and moving up to 12 next year....
In a dynasty league, you don't want to add owners just for the sake of adding owners....the goal is the longevity of your league...that is why it took my league so long to become a 12 teamer...I was very picky...
As far as starting lineups; I feel everyone agrees that you need to do one of two extremes:
Very small or Very big starting requirements....
Troy_Polamalyourass said:Just a thought, but I would alter the starting lineup to QB, RB, WR, TE and one flex....that would make each owner have to start the right players....also, I would eliminate free agency and only allow trades...
I get that you don't just want to add any two owners cause you want the league to last but on the flip side...people can only read so many threads that start out like:
what should I do? I feel like I had a nice draft but am always looking to improve...lol
Rodgers
foster...spiller...Peterson...murray...ball
calvin...Julio...marshall...percy
graham