 
  
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    
    It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
 
 
     Whos_Ur_Doggie 11693
 Whos_Ur_Doggie 11693 JRMRRT 10774
 JRMRRT 10774 bddavidson 10417
 bddavidson 10417 Wutthecrapman 8764
 Wutthecrapman 8764 BuckysGT 7385
 BuckysGT 7385 LukeB5301 6998
 LukeB5301 6998 garyzab 6414
 garyzab 6414 Smitty 5848
 Smitty 5848 TBL 4426
 TBL 4426 fontaines 3713
 fontaines 3713 branch0095 3519
 branch0095 3519 
    jknighton said:http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/23017579/report-vince-young-to-try-out-for-packers-on-monday
Not the greatest back-up QB. But he's gotta be better than Graham Harrell and BJ Coleman. What's your thoughts on this Packer fans?
bddavidson said:Immature kid could've had a good future if he had removed head from a$$
bddavidson said:Immature kid could've had a good future if he had removed head from a$$
BuckysGT said:jknighton said:http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/23017579/report-vince-young-to-try-out-for-packers-on-monday
Not the greatest back-up QB. But he's gotta be better than Graham Harrell and BJ Coleman. What's your thoughts on this Packer fans?
He can't be worse than what they have. Roto reported tat they will sign him so the defense can practice against a mobile, dual threat type of qb. They have Kaep and RG3 the first 2 weeks. It's a good idea if true.
Whos_Ur_Doggie said:LukeB5301 said:Great move by gb imo
What makes you think this?
Whos_Ur_Doggie said:I get the "defense vs read option" part of your thought process but if Rodgers were to go down to injury, Young isn't stepping in and winning anything in GB IMO. They would be better off looking for a better option than Young if you ask me.