It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
jknighton said:http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/23017579/report-vince-young-to-try-out-for-packers-on-monday
Not the greatest back-up QB. But he's gotta be better than Graham Harrell and BJ Coleman. What's your thoughts on this Packer fans?
bddavidson said:Immature kid could've had a good future if he had removed head from a$$
bddavidson said:Immature kid could've had a good future if he had removed head from a$$
BuckysGT said:jknighton said:http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/23017579/report-vince-young-to-try-out-for-packers-on-monday
Not the greatest back-up QB. But he's gotta be better than Graham Harrell and BJ Coleman. What's your thoughts on this Packer fans?
He can't be worse than what they have. Roto reported tat they will sign him so the defense can practice against a mobile, dual threat type of qb. They have Kaep and RG3 the first 2 weeks. It's a good idea if true.
Whos_Ur_Doggie said:LukeB5301 said:Great move by gb imo
What makes you think this?
Whos_Ur_Doggie said:I get the "defense vs read option" part of your thought process but if Rodgers were to go down to injury, Young isn't stepping in and winning anything in GB IMO. They would be better off looking for a better option than Young if you ask me.