It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
branch0095 said:Now it's really Vereen time! Ridley with the fumble. Bellichik won't be putting up with that in a game like this. Vereen is about to go OFF!
bddavidson said:garyzab said:Way to go Ridley!!!!!!!!!!!!!
exactly why I own Ridley in zero league....get ready vereen... \m/
branch0095 said:Now it's really Vereen time! Ridley with the fumble. Bellichik won't be putting up with that in a game like this. Vereen is about to go OFF!
branch0095 said:Payton34 said:branch0095 said:ump said:branch0095 said:For those that have anointed Stacy a top 15ish dynasty RB, I'd be a little worried about Benny Cunningham.
I really like Cunningham for next year. It will probably end up as another timeshare.
I had people attacking me in a Stacy thread because I didn't have him ranked inside my top 20 yet. Cunningham could surpass Stacy, or he could go back to riding the pine when Stacy is healthy. We just don't know. This is why I don't bump RBs like Stacy up my dynasty rankings so quickly. I need to see more than a few games out of them before they become high RB2s in dynasty for me.
So, to get this straight... You don't bump players like Stacy up because they might get hurt?
Cunningham was zero, zip, zilch, nada before Stacy got hurt... The situation wasn't "fluid". The starter (that would be Stacy) got hurt... Cunningham proved that he too could run all over a terrible Bears' rushing D as well.... Does the injury now mean that the situation is fluid NOW?
Yeah, maybe... But sans injury you were still off not giving Stacy a bump in your dynasty rankings. JMO
To say the situation is not fluid is extremely short sighted IMO. This is dynasty, not redraft. Stacy has looked good, but there's no guarantee of his role/usage for next year forward. It could very well turn into some sort of committee. Is there a guarantee of any RBs usage next year? No, but Stacy also has no history behind him to support his usage. I didn't keep Stacy lower in my rankings because he "might get hurt" . I kept him lower because I'm not totally convinced of his long term value yet. I view him in the low RB2 range at this point. If you don't agree with my rankings then great, you don't have to use them. I could say the same thing about your rankings if you're trying to say you have Stacy as a RB1 in dynasty at this point.Also, FWIW I DID give Stacy a bump in my rankings. He was in the 40-45 range before he started getting touches. I bumped him close to 20 spots when he became the starter.
bddavidson said:garyzab said:bddavidson said:Hey Gary what should we do ? Romo won a game...
I had a beer in his honor
LOl that is the spirit buddy!!!! \m/
bddavidson said:garyzab said:Way to go Ridley!!!!!!!!!!!!!
exactly why I own Ridley in zero league....get ready vereen... \m/
branch0095 said:Wow, this could get ugly fast for NE.
Payton34 said:bddavidson said:garyzab said:Way to go Ridley!!!!!!!!!!!!!
exactly why I own Ridley in zero league....get ready vereen... \m/
You mean, "Get ready Blount", right? This is Bellichick we're talking about after all... ;)
Payton34 said:branch0095 said:Payton34 said:branch0095 said:ump said:branch0095 said:For those that have anointed Stacy a top 15ish dynasty RB, I'd be a little worried about Benny Cunningham.
I really like Cunningham for next year. It will probably end up as another timeshare.
I had people attacking me in a Stacy thread because I didn't have him ranked inside my top 20 yet. Cunningham could surpass Stacy, or he could go back to riding the pine when Stacy is healthy. We just don't know. This is why I don't bump RBs like Stacy up my dynasty rankings so quickly. I need to see more than a few games out of them before they become high RB2s in dynasty for me.
So, to get this straight... You don't bump players like Stacy up because they might get hurt?
Cunningham was zero, zip, zilch, nada before Stacy got hurt... The situation wasn't "fluid". The starter (that would be Stacy) got hurt... Cunningham proved that he too could run all over a terrible Bears' rushing D as well.... Does the injury now mean that the situation is fluid NOW?
Yeah, maybe... But sans injury you were still off not giving Stacy a bump in your dynasty rankings. JMO
To say the situation is not fluid is extremely short sighted IMO. This is dynasty, not redraft. Stacy has looked good, but there's no guarantee of his role/usage for next year forward. It could very well turn into some sort of committee. Is there a guarantee of any RBs usage next year? No, but Stacy also has no history behind him to support his usage. I didn't keep Stacy lower in my rankings because he "might get hurt" . I kept him lower because I'm not totally convinced of his long term value yet. I view him in the low RB2 range at this point. If you don't agree with my rankings then great, you don't have to use them. I could say the same thing about your rankings if you're trying to say you have Stacy as a RB1 in dynasty at this point.Also, FWIW I DID give Stacy a bump in my rankings. He was in the 40-45 range before he started getting touches. I bumped him close to 20 spots when he became the starter.
But you're attempting to say you're somehow redeemed because the guy got hurt.... Not buying it.
Stacy was clearly "The Guy". Let me ask you this? Where do you have Eddie Lacy right now in your rankings? Is that situation "fluid" to you? Just curious because it's almost an exactly parallel point of reference. (Except Lacy didn't get hurt today)
bddavidson said:well thought we have a good ballgame ..now it is a full blown blowout! guess I have to go watch it is a wonderful life... :((