It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
jknighton said:Last year you had to give up at least the 1.1 to get upside guys like Ball, Miller and Wilson. Gordon was somewhat easier to get since he had 5th-6th round value. Hilton, givens and Cook still were not easy to get. The others are slipping my mind, but the point is it wasn't super easy to get anyone at all on the upside board last year.
I have found that getting #1,#2, #4, #5 are WAY easier to get than the guys who were in those spots last year.
emurrell17 said:I hate conservative owners...my money league's owners are that way. They just assume that if I want someone they must be getting jipped
Smitty said:Well, No. 1 (not the name, the actual projection) is bold as all heck. 2, 3, 4 and 8 are crazy almost. Not sure how some are suggesting this year is any less bold than last year. That's just silly IMO. As soon as some of these posted, there were "Now that's bold" comments. And, as for No. 8, news broke today ironically on Rotoworld/ESPN talking about an ESPN prediction... for those that didn't trade in that first 12 hours the Upside Board prediction was up :) it still won't move No. 8's value so high that he won't still have monster upside, especially in redraft. If he can't be had at RB3/4/5 type value in leagues, you were never going to get him from that owner anyway. Nothing is concrete with his situation yet, if someone isn't trading him, they just liked him, just like us, and they were never sending him packing.
If you want a guy like No. 8, or No. 5, don't throw up red flags by doing 1 for 1 type offers, it just makes people go "why do you want him, what's breaking news wise on this guy?"
Swampies said:Smitty said:Well, No. 1 (not the name, the actual projection) is bold as all heck. 2, 3, 4 and 8 are crazy almost. Not sure how some are suggesting this year is any less bold than last year. That's just silly IMO. As soon as some of these posted, there were "Now that's bold" comments. And, as for No. 8, news broke today ironically on Rotoworld/ESPN talking about an ESPN prediction... for those that didn't trade in that first 12 hours the Upside Board prediction was up :) it still won't move No. 8's value so high that he won't still have monster upside, especially in redraft. If he can't be had at RB3/4/5 type value in leagues, you were never going to get him from that owner anyway. Nothing is concrete with his situation yet, if someone isn't trading him, they just liked him, just like us, and they were never sending him packing.
If you want a guy like No. 8, or No. 5, don't throw up red flags by doing 1 for 1 type offers, it just makes people go "why do you want him, what's breaking news wise on this guy?"
Smitty I think it's because we think alike and I saw this coming with your upside predictions to be honest with you. Heck we like the same shows why not the same players, right? I guess when I hear Bold I see that as a player coming out of left field to me, a guy I never thought of! I'm all on board with your upside players that's not the issue. It's that I can't make a trade to make them worth their upside in value for me is the thing.
cohendpt said:Does anyone see something on my roster in sig who I cud try and offer for 3? I was hit up for bell earlier for 3 and a pick. I like 3 a lot but don't wan to overpay...what wud work?
View DC Nation Leagues: One | Two | Three | Four | Five | Instant Classics III Draft | DC BBall Keeper Lg